Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Raymond Johnson v. Keith Hawthorne Hyundai, 16-1740 (2016)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 16-1740 Visitors: 5
Filed: Dec. 19, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1740 RAYMOND A. JOHNSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. KEITH HAWTHORNE HYUNDAI; MCKENNEY CADILLAC CHEVROLET INC.; MCKENNEY HONDA, Defendants – Appellees, and EEOC CHARLOTTE DISTRICT OFFICE; RUBEN DANIELS, JR.; MCKENNEY HONDA R&S SALES INC., Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., District Judge. (3:15-cv-00148-RJC-DSC) Submitted: D
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1740 RAYMOND A. JOHNSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. KEITH HAWTHORNE HYUNDAI; MCKENNEY CADILLAC CHEVROLET INC.; MCKENNEY HONDA, Defendants – Appellees, and EEOC CHARLOTTE DISTRICT OFFICE; RUBEN DANIELS, JR.; MCKENNEY HONDA R&S SALES INC., Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., District Judge. (3:15-cv-00148-RJC-DSC) Submitted: December 15, 2016 Decided: December 19, 2016 Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Raymond A. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Helen Faith Hiser, Amy Yager Jenkins, MCANGUS, GOUDELOCK & COURIE, LLC, Mount Pleasant, South Carolina; Michael L. Carpenter, GRAY, LAYTON, KERSH, SOLOMON, FURR & SMITH, PA, Gastonia, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Raymond A. Johnson appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil complaint, ordering him to pay monetary sanctions, and imposing a prefiling injunction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Johnson v. Keith Hawthorne Hyundai, No. 3:15-cv-00148-RJC-DSC (W.D.N.C. Feb. 3, 2016 & June 27, 2016). We deny Johnson’s motions to recuse opposing counsel and for sanctions, and we deny the Appellees’ motion for sanctions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer