Filed: Nov. 16, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1761 STARSHA SEWELL, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. AMERICAN EDUCATION SERVICES/PHEAA, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District Judge. (8:15-cv-03076-DKC) Submitted: November 14, 2016 Decided: November 16, 2016 Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Starsha Sewell, Appe
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1761 STARSHA SEWELL, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. AMERICAN EDUCATION SERVICES/PHEAA, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District Judge. (8:15-cv-03076-DKC) Submitted: November 14, 2016 Decided: November 16, 2016 Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Starsha Sewell, Appel..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1761 STARSHA SEWELL, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. AMERICAN EDUCATION SERVICES/PHEAA, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District Judge. (8:15-cv-03076-DKC) Submitted: November 14, 2016 Decided: November 16, 2016 Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Starsha Sewell, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Paul Esposito, Thomas Clinton Goodhue, HUNTON & WILLIAMS, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Starsha Sewell appeals the district court’s order dismissing this action raising various claims related to a default student loan. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sewell v. American Edu. Servs./PHEAA, No. 8:15-cv-03076-DKC (D. Md. June 24, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
