Filed: Dec. 19, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1828 CHASE CARMEN HUNTER, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. JANICE MARIE CARTER-LOVEJOY; LONG & FOSTER COMPANIES, INC.; LONG AND FOSTER REAL ESTATE, INC., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:15-cv-00903-CMH-TCB) Submitted: December 15, 2016 Decided: December 19, 2016 Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circu
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1828 CHASE CARMEN HUNTER, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. JANICE MARIE CARTER-LOVEJOY; LONG & FOSTER COMPANIES, INC.; LONG AND FOSTER REAL ESTATE, INC., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:15-cv-00903-CMH-TCB) Submitted: December 15, 2016 Decided: December 19, 2016 Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circui..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1828
CHASE CARMEN HUNTER,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
JANICE MARIE CARTER-LOVEJOY; LONG & FOSTER COMPANIES, INC.;
LONG AND FOSTER REAL ESTATE, INC.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior
District Judge. (1:15-cv-00903-CMH-TCB)
Submitted: December 15, 2016 Decided: December 19, 2016
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Chase Carmen Hunter, Appellant Pro Se. Brien Anthony Roche,
JOHNSON & ROCHE, McLean, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Chase Carmen Hunter appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on her complaint raising 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985,
and 1986 (2012) claims and state law claims. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Hunter v.
Carter-Lovejoy, No. 1:15-cv-00903-CMH-TCB (E.D. Va. June 21,
2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2