Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Margaret Laguerra v. U.S. Department of Treasury, 16-1832 (2016)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 16-1832 Visitors: 8
Filed: Nov. 29, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1832 MARGARET A. LAGUERRA, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY; INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE; U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. (8:14-cv-02701-TDC) Submitted: November 22, 2016 Decided: November 29, 2016 Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAV
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1832 MARGARET A. LAGUERRA, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY; INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE; U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. (8:14-cv-02701-TDC) Submitted: November 22, 2016 Decided: November 29, 2016 Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Margaret A. Laguerra, Appellant Pro Se. Jane Elizabeth Andersen, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Margaret A. Laguerra appeals the district court’s order denying relief in Laguerra’s employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Laguerra v. United States Dep’t of Treasury, No. 8:14- cv-02701-TDC (D. Md. June 20, 2016). We deny Laguerra’s motion to file physical exhibits and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer