Filed: Oct. 25, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6235 NATHANIEL LEKAI HART, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BOBBY SHEARIN, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. George L. Russell, III, District Judge. (1:14-cv-02477-GLR) Submitted: October 14, 2016 Decided: October 25, 2016 Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Nathaniel Lekai Hart, Appellant Pro Se. S
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6235 NATHANIEL LEKAI HART, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BOBBY SHEARIN, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. George L. Russell, III, District Judge. (1:14-cv-02477-GLR) Submitted: October 14, 2016 Decided: October 25, 2016 Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Nathaniel Lekai Hart, Appellant Pro Se. St..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6235
NATHANIEL LEKAI HART,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BOBBY SHEARIN,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. George L. Russell, III, District Judge.
(1:14-cv-02477-GLR)
Submitted: October 14, 2016 Decided: October 25, 2016
Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nathaniel Lekai Hart, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane-
Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Nathaniel Lekai Hart appeals the district court’s order
granting Bobby Shearin’s motion for summary judgment and denying
relief on Hart’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hart v.
Shearin, No. 1:14-cv-02477-GLR (D. Md. Jan. 15, 2016). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2