Filed: Nov. 09, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6252 CHARLES LANGHAM, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; LT. R. WRIGHT; ANGELA DUNBAR; OFFICER STOOTS; OFFICER MALONE; OFFICER BOYD; PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT SCOTT; MR. DUVALL, Psychologist; LIEUTENANT CHASE; TINA SCOTT; RENE DAUBON, Defendants – Appellees, and ERIC HOLDER, Attorney General, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6252 CHARLES LANGHAM, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; LT. R. WRIGHT; ANGELA DUNBAR; OFFICER STOOTS; OFFICER MALONE; OFFICER BOYD; PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT SCOTT; MR. DUVALL, Psychologist; LIEUTENANT CHASE; TINA SCOTT; RENE DAUBON, Defendants – Appellees, and ERIC HOLDER, Attorney General, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W...
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6252
CHARLES LANGHAM,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; LT. R. WRIGHT; ANGELA DUNBAR;
OFFICER STOOTS; OFFICER MALONE; OFFICER BOYD; PHYSICIAN
ASSISTANT SCOTT; MR. DUVALL, Psychologist; LIEUTENANT CHASE;
TINA SCOTT; RENE DAUBON,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
ERIC HOLDER, Attorney General,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:14-ct-03143-BO)
Submitted: October 18, 2016 Decided: November 9, 2016
Before TRAXLER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Langham, Appellant Pro Se. Robert J. Dodson, Special
Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Charles Langham appeals the district court’s order granting
summary judgment to Defendants and denying relief on his
complaint raising claims pursuant to the Federal Torts Claim Act
(FTCA), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671-2680 (2012), and Bivens v.
Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,
403 U.S.
388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, although we grant Langham leave to proceed
in forma pauperis, we affirm the district court’s order.
Langham v. United States, No. 5:14-ct-03143-BO (E.D.N.C. filed
Jan. 27, 2016 & entered Jan. 28, 2016). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3