Filed: Jul. 22, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6634 EDDIE MILTON GAREY, JR., Petitioner - Appellant, v. ANDREW MANSUKEANI, Warden of Estill FCI, Respondent - Appellee, and ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR., US Attorney General, Respondent. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. (8:15-cv-00056-BHH) Submitted: July 21, 2016 Decided: July 22, 2016 Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6634 EDDIE MILTON GAREY, JR., Petitioner - Appellant, v. ANDREW MANSUKEANI, Warden of Estill FCI, Respondent - Appellee, and ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR., US Attorney General, Respondent. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. (8:15-cv-00056-BHH) Submitted: July 21, 2016 Decided: July 22, 2016 Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6634
EDDIE MILTON GAREY, JR.,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
ANDREW MANSUKEANI, Warden of Estill FCI,
Respondent - Appellee,
and
ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR., US Attorney General,
Respondent.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson. Bruce H. Hendricks, District
Judge. (8:15-cv-00056-BHH)
Submitted: July 21, 2016 Decided: July 22, 2016
Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eddie Milton Garey, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Eddie Milton Garey, Jr., a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the
magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice ∗ his 28 U.S.C.
§ 2241 (2012) petition and the court’s order denying his Fed. R.
Civ. P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Garey v. Mansukeani, No. 8:15-cv-00056-
BHH (D.S.C. Jan. 7, 2016; Apr. 19, 2016). We grant Garey’s
motion for an extension of time to file his supplemental
informal brief, and we deny Garey’s motion for appointment of
counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
∗ We conclude that the district court’s dismissal order is a
final, appealable order. See Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid
Soc’y, Inc.,
807 F.3d 619, 623-24, 629-30 (4th Cir. 2015).
2