Filed: Oct. 20, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6642 ROBERT CRAIG BARBEE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MUNICIPALITY OF CABARRUS COUNTY; ROXANN VANEEKHOVEN, District Attorney; CONCORD POLICE DEPARTMENT; PATRICK MCCLASKEY; PATRICK TIERNEY; NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, District Judge. (1:16-cv-00194-TDS-LPA) Submitte
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6642 ROBERT CRAIG BARBEE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MUNICIPALITY OF CABARRUS COUNTY; ROXANN VANEEKHOVEN, District Attorney; CONCORD POLICE DEPARTMENT; PATRICK MCCLASKEY; PATRICK TIERNEY; NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, District Judge. (1:16-cv-00194-TDS-LPA) Submitted..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6642
ROBERT CRAIG BARBEE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MUNICIPALITY OF CABARRUS COUNTY; ROXANN VANEEKHOVEN,
District Attorney; CONCORD POLICE DEPARTMENT; PATRICK
MCCLASKEY; PATRICK TIERNEY; NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC SAFETY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder,
District Judge. (1:16-cv-00194-TDS-LPA)
Submitted: October 18, 2016 Decided: October 20, 2016
Before WILKINSON, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Craig Barbee, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Robert Craig Barbee appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915A(b) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Barbee v. Municipality of Cabarrus Cty.,
No. 1:16-cv-00194-TDS-LPA (M.D.N.C. Apr. 19, 2016). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2