Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Michael McGee, 16-6745 (2016)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 16-6745 Visitors: 16
Filed: Oct. 04, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6745 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MICHAEL T. MCGEE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:13-cr-00023-FPS-JES-1) Submitted: September 29, 2016 Decided: October 4, 2016 Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Micha
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6745 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MICHAEL T. MCGEE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:13-cr-00023-FPS-JES-1) Submitted: September 29, 2016 Decided: October 4, 2016 Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael T. McGee, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Hugh McWilliams, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, William J. Ihlenfeld, II, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Michael T. McGee appeals the district court’s order granting as framed his Fed. R. Crim. P. 36 motion to correct a clerical error in the transcript of his jury trial proceedings. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. The court’s correction of the trial transcript is supported by other record documents. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v McGee, No. 5:13-cr- 00023-FPS-JES-1 (N.D. W. Va. May 11, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer