Filed: Oct. 21, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6953 DANNY MCCOY MILES, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DR. TAYLOR, Doctor at Western Tidewater Regional Jail; MRS. DARDEN, Head of Medical at Western Tidewater Regional Jail, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:16-cv-00602-LMB-JFA) Submitted: October 18, 2016 Decided: October 21, 2016 Before WILKINSON
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6953 DANNY MCCOY MILES, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DR. TAYLOR, Doctor at Western Tidewater Regional Jail; MRS. DARDEN, Head of Medical at Western Tidewater Regional Jail, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:16-cv-00602-LMB-JFA) Submitted: October 18, 2016 Decided: October 21, 2016 Before WILKINSON,..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6953
DANNY MCCOY MILES, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DR. TAYLOR, Doctor at Western Tidewater Regional Jail; MRS.
DARDEN, Head of Medical at Western Tidewater Regional Jail,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema,
District Judge. (1:16-cv-00602-LMB-JFA)
Submitted: October 18, 2016 Decided: October 21, 2016
Before WILKINSON, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Danny McCoy Miles, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Danny McCoy Miles, Jr. appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Miles v. Taylor, No. 1:16-cv-00602-LMB-JFA (E.D. Va.
July 6, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2