MOUNTCASTLE v. PREMIER AUTO BROKERS INC., 15-2381. (2016)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20160428117
Visitors: 5
Filed: Apr. 28, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 28, 2016
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM . Charlotte D. Mountcastle appeals the district court's order dismissing her amended complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Mountcastle v. Premier Auto Brokers Inc., No. 2:15-cv-00170-RBS-RJK (E.D. Va. Oct. 19, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the f
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM . Charlotte D. Mountcastle appeals the district court's order dismissing her amended complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Mountcastle v. Premier Auto Brokers Inc., No. 2:15-cv-00170-RBS-RJK (E.D. Va. Oct. 19, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the fa..
More
UNPUBLISHED
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM.
Charlotte D. Mountcastle appeals the district court's order dismissing her amended complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Mountcastle v. Premier Auto Brokers Inc., No. 2:15-cv-00170-RBS-RJK (E.D. Va. Oct. 19, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
