Filed: Jan. 24, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1138 GREGORY SHAWN MERCER, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. FAIRFAX COUNTY CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES, (FCCPS); FAIRFAX COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CODE COMPLIANCE, (FCDCC); ELIZABETH PERRY, FCDCC Supervisor On 3/5/14; JACK BLAIR, FCDCC Employee On 3/5/14; LATYCIA TANKS, FCDCC Employee On 3/5/14; KERRY S. ALLANDER, Virginia State Police Supervisor On 6/9/06; KENNETH S. HOUTZ, Virginia State Trooper On 6/9/06; KATHLEEN H. MACKAY, Fairfax C
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1138 GREGORY SHAWN MERCER, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. FAIRFAX COUNTY CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES, (FCCPS); FAIRFAX COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CODE COMPLIANCE, (FCDCC); ELIZABETH PERRY, FCDCC Supervisor On 3/5/14; JACK BLAIR, FCDCC Employee On 3/5/14; LATYCIA TANKS, FCDCC Employee On 3/5/14; KERRY S. ALLANDER, Virginia State Police Supervisor On 6/9/06; KENNETH S. HOUTZ, Virginia State Trooper On 6/9/06; KATHLEEN H. MACKAY, Fairfax Co..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1138
GREGORY SHAWN MERCER,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
FAIRFAX COUNTY CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES, (FCCPS); FAIRFAX
COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CODE COMPLIANCE, (FCDCC); ELIZABETH
PERRY, FCDCC Supervisor On 3/5/14; JACK BLAIR, FCDCC
Employee On 3/5/14; LATYCIA TANKS, FCDCC Employee On
3/5/14; KERRY S. ALLANDER, Virginia State Police Supervisor
On 6/9/06; KENNETH S. HOUTZ, Virginia State Trooper On
6/9/06; KATHLEEN H. MACKAY, Fairfax County Circuit Court
Judge On 6/22/07; ELIZABETH A. MCCLANANHAN, Court Of Appels
Of VA Judge On 2/18/09; LAWRENCE L. KOONTZ, Supreme Court
Of Virginia Judge On 9/22/09; DONALD W. LEMON, Supreme
Court Of Virginia Judge On 9/22/09; LEROY F. MILLETTE,
Supreme Court Of Virginia Judge On 9/22/09; S. BERNARD
GOODWYN, Supreme Court Of Virginia Judge On 9/22/09; ALECIA
WASKLEWICZ, FCCPS Supervisor On 3/6/14; FAIRFAX COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, (FCBoS); SHARON BULOVA, Chairman Of
Fairfax County Board Of Supervisors,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
ALICIA WASKLEWICS, FCCPS Supervisor On 3/6/14; TANYA E.
POWERS, FCCPS Social Worker On 3/6/14; WALTER S. FELTON,
JR., Court Of Appeals Of Virginia Judge On 2/18/09;
LARRY G. ELDER, Court Of Appeals Of Virginia Judge On
2/18/09; LEROY R. HASSELL, SR., Deceased Supreme Court Of
Virginia Judge, 2/9/11; BARBARA M. KEENAN, Supreme Court Of
Virginia Judge On 9/22/09; CYNTHIA D. KINSER, Supreme Court
Of Virginia Judge On 9/22/09,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District
Judge. (1:15-cv-00302-LO-TCB)
Submitted: January 6, 2017 Decided: January 24, 2017
Before SHEDD and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gregory Shawn Mercer, Appellant Pro Se. Sara Grossman Silverman,
Assistant County Attorney, Fairfax, Virginia; Mark Rankin
Herring, Attorney General, Christian Arrowsmith Parrish, OFFICE
OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Rhodes
Beahm Ritenour, Deputy Attorney General, Liza Shawn Simmons,
Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Gregory Shawn Mercer appeals the district court’s orders
dismissing this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action and denying his
motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Mercer v. Fairfax Cnty.
Child Protective Servs., No. 1:15-cv-00302-LO-TCB (E.D. Va.
Aug. 25 & Dec. 17, 2015; Feb. 11, 2016). The motions to compel,
for a subpoena, to clarify, and to direct a state judge to
verify a record’s existence are denied. We grant the motions to
exceed the length limitations for the brief and to file amended
and supplemental informal reply briefs and amendments. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3