Filed: May 01, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1707 FOREST CAPITAL, LLC, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DAVID PEARSALL, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (1:14-cv-01670-JFM) Submitted: April 24, 2017 Decided: May 1, 2017 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David Pearsall, Appellant
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1707 FOREST CAPITAL, LLC, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DAVID PEARSALL, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (1:14-cv-01670-JFM) Submitted: April 24, 2017 Decided: May 1, 2017 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David Pearsall, Appellant ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1707
FOREST CAPITAL, LLC,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DAVID PEARSALL,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J.
Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (1:14-cv-01670-JFM)
Submitted: April 24, 2017 Decided: May 1, 2017
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Pearsall, Appellant Pro Se. Jeremy Stuart Friedberg, LEITESS FRIEDBERG PC,
Owings Mills, Maryland; Pierce C. Murphy, LEITESS FRIEDBERG PC, Baltimore,
Maryland; Jeffrey A. Wurst, RUSKIN MOSCOU FALTISCHEK, PC, Uniondale, New
York, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
David Pearsall seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting Forest Capital,
LLC’s motion for partial summary judgment. This court may exercise jurisdiction only
over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders,
28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,
337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). Because Forest Capital’s claim for tortious interference with
contract remains pending in the district court, the order Pearsall seeks to appeal is neither
a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss
the appeal for lack of jurisdiction and deny as moot Pearsall’s motion for summary
disposition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
2