Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Fatmata Kamara v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC, 16-1901 (2017)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 16-1901 Visitors: 44
Filed: Feb. 07, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1901 FATMATA KAMARA; MOHAMED KAMARA, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC; BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; HSBC BANK USA, N.A.; COMMONWEALTH TRUSTEES, LLC, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:16-cv-00415-LMB-MSN) Submitted: January 31, 2017 Decided: February 7, 2017 Befo
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1901 FATMATA KAMARA; MOHAMED KAMARA, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC; BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; HSBC BANK USA, N.A.; COMMONWEALTH TRUSTEES, LLC, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:16-cv-00415-LMB-MSN) Submitted: January 31, 2017 Decided: February 7, 2017 Before DUNCAN and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Fatmata Kamara; Mohamed Kamara, Appellants Pro Se. Ryan Van Patten Dougherty, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Norfolk, Virginia; Nathaniel Patrick Lee, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Tysons Corner, Virginia; Ruhi Fatima Mirza, Sara Nicholson Tussey, ROSENBERG & ASSOCIATES, LLC, Vienna, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Fatmata Kamara and Mohamed Kamara appeal the district court’s order granting Defendants’ Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motions to dismiss their amended civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Kamara v. Nationstar Mortg., LLC, No. 1:16-cv-00415-LMB-MSN (E.D. Va. July 15, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer