Filed: Jan. 27, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1951 MICHAEL MCCLOUD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. A. M. FUNAIOCK, Defendant - Appellee, and KAREN N. HENDERSON, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. John A. Gibney, Jr., District Judge. (4:15-cv-00005-JAG-LRL) Submitted: January 19, 2017 Decided: January 27, 2017 Before WILKINSON, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opini
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1951 MICHAEL MCCLOUD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. A. M. FUNAIOCK, Defendant - Appellee, and KAREN N. HENDERSON, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. John A. Gibney, Jr., District Judge. (4:15-cv-00005-JAG-LRL) Submitted: January 19, 2017 Decided: January 27, 2017 Before WILKINSON, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinio..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1951 MICHAEL MCCLOUD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. A. M. FUNAIOCK, Defendant - Appellee, and KAREN N. HENDERSON, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. John A. Gibney, Jr., District Judge. (4:15-cv-00005-JAG-LRL) Submitted: January 19, 2017 Decided: January 27, 2017 Before WILKINSON, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael McCloud, Appellant Pro Se. Adonica Baine, Darlene P. Bradberry, Christopher Michael Midgley, OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Michael McCloud appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil action with prejudice under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2) and taxing costs. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See McCloud v. Funaiock, No. 4:15-cv-00005-JAG-LRL (E.D. Va. July 1, 2016; June 20, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
