Filed: Jan. 19, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1993 SHARON THOMAS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DAVIS M. PARKER, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Registered Agent; ZACONJIA C. TITUS, Social Worker; BONNIE B. HAMMERSLEY, Orange County Government, Registered Agent, Department of Social Services; DENISE SHAFFER, Orange County Department of Social Services, Assistant Director; DUSTON LOWELL, Orange County Government, Program Manager; MARY POWELL, Vanguard Profe
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1993 SHARON THOMAS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DAVIS M. PARKER, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Registered Agent; ZACONJIA C. TITUS, Social Worker; BONNIE B. HAMMERSLEY, Orange County Government, Registered Agent, Department of Social Services; DENISE SHAFFER, Orange County Department of Social Services, Assistant Director; DUSTON LOWELL, Orange County Government, Program Manager; MARY POWELL, Vanguard Profes..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1993 SHARON THOMAS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DAVIS M. PARKER, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Registered Agent; ZACONJIA C. TITUS, Social Worker; BONNIE B. HAMMERSLEY, Orange County Government, Registered Agent, Department of Social Services; DENISE SHAFFER, Orange County Department of Social Services, Assistant Director; DUSTON LOWELL, Orange County Government, Program Manager; MARY POWELL, Vanguard Professional Staffing, Registered Agent; SUSAN BOYETTE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:16-cv-00482-GCM) Submitted: January 17, 2017 Decided: January 19, 2017 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sharon Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Sharon Thomas appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. Thomas v. Parker, No. 3:16-cv-00482-GCM (W.D.N.C. July 28, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2