Filed: Feb. 02, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-2047 PHILIP BUTLER GROGGINS, Debtor - Appellant, v. JUDY A. ROBBINS, Trustee - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (7:15-cv-00690-NKM) Submitted: January 31, 2017 Decided: February 2, 2017 Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Philip Butler Groggins, Appella
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-2047 PHILIP BUTLER GROGGINS, Debtor - Appellant, v. JUDY A. ROBBINS, Trustee - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (7:15-cv-00690-NKM) Submitted: January 31, 2017 Decided: February 2, 2017 Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Philip Butler Groggins, Appellan..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-2047
PHILIP BUTLER GROGGINS,
Debtor - Appellant,
v.
JUDY A. ROBBINS,
Trustee - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Norman K. Moon, Senior District
Judge. (7:15-cv-00690-NKM)
Submitted: January 31, 2017 Decided: February 2, 2017
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Philip Butler Groggins, Appellant Pro Se. William Joseph Alan
Charboneau, OFFICE OF THE U.S. TRUSTEE, Roanoke, Virginia; John
Alfred Postulka, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington,
D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Philip Groggins appeals from the district court’s order
affirming the bankruptcy court’s order denying him a discharge in
his bankruptcy case pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 727(a)(2)(A) (2012).
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Groggins v. Robbins, No. 7:15-cv-00690-NKM (W.D. Va. Aug.
30, 2016). We deny Groggins’ motion for a transcript at government
expense, deny his motion for reversal on appeal, and dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2