Filed: Jan. 19, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-2112 ERVIN MIDDLETON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company; ATLANTIC LAW GROUP, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company; DOES 1-100, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:16-cv-01084-LMB-MSN) Submitted: January 17, 2017 Decided: January 19,
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-2112 ERVIN MIDDLETON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company; ATLANTIC LAW GROUP, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company; DOES 1-100, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:16-cv-01084-LMB-MSN) Submitted: January 17, 2017 Decided: January 19, 2..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-2112
ERVIN MIDDLETON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES, LLC, a Delaware Limited
Liability Company; ATLANTIC LAW GROUP, LLC, a Delaware Limited
Liability Company; DOES 1-100,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District
Judge. (1:16-cv-01084-LMB-MSN)
Submitted: January 17, 2017 Decided: January 19, 2017
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ervin Middleton, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Ervin Middleton appeals the district court’s order dismissing
his complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have
reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous.
Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss
the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Middleton
v. Carrington Mortg. Servs., LLC, No. 1:16-cv-01084-LMB-MSN (E.D.
Va. Aug. 26, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
2