Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Tomislav Milic v. Kevin McCarthy, 16-2362 (2017)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 16-2362 Visitors: 2
Filed: Apr. 27, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-2362 In re: D.C. DIAMOND CORPORATION, Debtor, - TOMISLAV MILIC, Creditor - Appellant, v. KEVIN R. MCCARTHY, Chapter 7 Trustee, Trustee - Appellee, and DEVELOPERS SURETY AND IDENMNITY COMPANY, Creditor; STEWART TITLE GUARANTY CO., Creditor, Transferee of Old Line Bank, Successor to The Washington Savings Bank, FSB, Creditors, and D.C. DIAMOND CORPORATION, Debtor, and JUDY A. ROBBINS, 11, Trustee. Appeal from the United Sta
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-2362 In re: D.C. DIAMOND CORPORATION, Debtor, ----------------------------------- TOMISLAV MILIC, Creditor - Appellant, v. KEVIN R. MCCARTHY, Chapter 7 Trustee, Trustee - Appellee, and DEVELOPERS SURETY AND IDENMNITY COMPANY, Creditor; STEWART TITLE GUARANTY CO., Creditor, Transferee of Old Line Bank, Successor to The Washington Savings Bank, FSB, Creditors, and D.C. DIAMOND CORPORATION, Debtor, and JUDY A. ROBBINS, 11, Trustee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis III, Senior District Judge. (1:16-cv-01076-TSE-IDD; 12-16730- BFK) Submitted: April 25, 2017 Decided: April 27, 2017 Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tomislav Milic, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin R. McCarthy, MCCARTHY & WHITE, PLLC, McLean, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Tomislav Milic appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order denying his motion for an expedited hearing on his objection to a sale that was previously approved by the bankruptcy court. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the courts below. Milic v. McCarthy, Nos. 1:16-cv-01076-TSE-IDD, 12-16730-BFK (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 27, 2016; entered Oct. 28, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer