Filed: Jan. 13, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6924 DE’ANTE OCTARIO HOWARD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. KEITH A. KUHNE, Doctor; LARRY JONES, Doctor; DAVID GUINN, Physician’s Assistant; RUSSELL MCGALLARD, Medical Department Director, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Frank D. Whitney, Chief District Judge. (5:13-cv-00062-FDW) Submitted: December 28, 2016 Decided: January 13, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6924 DE’ANTE OCTARIO HOWARD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. KEITH A. KUHNE, Doctor; LARRY JONES, Doctor; DAVID GUINN, Physician’s Assistant; RUSSELL MCGALLARD, Medical Department Director, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Frank D. Whitney, Chief District Judge. (5:13-cv-00062-FDW) Submitted: December 28, 2016 Decided: January 13, 2017 ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6924
DE’ANTE OCTARIO HOWARD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
KEITH A. KUHNE, Doctor; LARRY JONES, Doctor; DAVID GUINN,
Physician’s Assistant; RUSSELL MCGALLARD, Medical Department
Director,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Frank D. Whitney,
Chief District Judge. (5:13-cv-00062-FDW)
Submitted: December 28, 2016 Decided: January 13, 2017
Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
De’Ante Octario Howard, Appellant Pro Se. Kelly Street Brown,
Elizabeth Pharr McCullough, YOUNG MOORE & HENDERSON, PA,
Raleigh, North Carolina; Kimberly D. Grande, NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
De’Ante Octario Howard appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Howard v. Kuhne, No. 5:13-cv-00062-FDW (W.D.N.C.
June 20, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2