Filed: Jan. 10, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-7006 MYRON RODERICK NUNN, Appellant, and LAWRENCE P. GILMARTIN, Plaintiff, v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY; DR. LAND; MEDICAL DEPARTMENT, Greene Correctional Institution, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:16-ct-03058-FL) Submitted: December 20, 2016 Decided: January 10, 2017 Before
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-7006 MYRON RODERICK NUNN, Appellant, and LAWRENCE P. GILMARTIN, Plaintiff, v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY; DR. LAND; MEDICAL DEPARTMENT, Greene Correctional Institution, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:16-ct-03058-FL) Submitted: December 20, 2016 Decided: January 10, 2017 Before W..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7006
MYRON RODERICK NUNN,
Appellant,
and
LAWRENCE P. GILMARTIN,
Plaintiff,
v.
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY; DR. LAND;
MEDICAL DEPARTMENT, Greene Correctional Institution,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:16-ct-03058-FL)
Submitted: December 20, 2016 Decided: January 10, 2017
Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON,
Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Myron Roderick Nunn, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Myron Roderick Nunn seeks to appeal the district court’s
failure to rule on his motion to amend a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012)
complaint. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final
orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and
collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P.
54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,
337 U.S. 541, 545-
46 (1949). Nunn’s notice of appeal challenges neither a final
order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
Accordingly, we deny Nunn’s motion for the appointment of
counsel and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2