Filed: Jan. 18, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-7087 MICHAEL J. GREENE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WILLIAM J. SADLER; GEORGE V. SITLER; WILLIAM O. (BILL) HUFFMAN; SCOTT A. ASH, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, Senior District Judge. (1:15-cv-15723) Submitted: December 30, 2016 Decided: January 18, 2017 Before MOTZ, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpu
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-7087 MICHAEL J. GREENE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WILLIAM J. SADLER; GEORGE V. SITLER; WILLIAM O. (BILL) HUFFMAN; SCOTT A. ASH, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, Senior District Judge. (1:15-cv-15723) Submitted: December 30, 2016 Decided: January 18, 2017 Before MOTZ, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpub..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7087
MICHAEL J. GREENE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WILLIAM J. SADLER; GEORGE V. SITLER; WILLIAM O. (BILL)
HUFFMAN; SCOTT A. ASH,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, Senior
District Judge. (1:15-cv-15723)
Submitted: December 30, 2016 Decided: January 18, 2017
Before MOTZ, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael J. Greene, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Michael J. Greene appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing Greene’s complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(2012). On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised
in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because
Greene’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the
district court’s disposition, Greene has forfeited appellate
review of the court’s order. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc.,
370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we affirm
the district court’s judgment. We deny Greene’s motion to
appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2