Filed: Feb. 03, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-7329 MATTHEW WAKEFIELD, In Propria Persona, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CIRCUIT COURT OF VIRGINIA, d/b/a Karin Riley Porter, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga, District Judge. (1:16-cv-00666-AJT-JFA) Submitted: January 31, 2017 Decided: February 3, 2017 Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by u
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-7329 MATTHEW WAKEFIELD, In Propria Persona, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CIRCUIT COURT OF VIRGINIA, d/b/a Karin Riley Porter, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga, District Judge. (1:16-cv-00666-AJT-JFA) Submitted: January 31, 2017 Decided: February 3, 2017 Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by un..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7329
MATTHEW WAKEFIELD, In Propria Persona,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CIRCUIT COURT OF VIRGINIA, d/b/a Karin Riley Porter,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga,
District Judge. (1:16-cv-00666-AJT-JFA)
Submitted: January 31, 2017 Decided: February 3, 2017
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Matthew Wakefield, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Matthew Wakefield appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)
(2012). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal
is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2012).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the
district court. Wakefield v. Circuit Court of Va., No. 1:16-cv-
00666-AJT-JFA (E.D. Va. Aug. 26, 2016). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2