Filed: Apr. 05, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1029 In Re: MICHAEL S. GORBEY, a/k/a Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (7:16-cv-00455-JLK-RSB; 7:16-cv-00522-JLK-RSB; 7:16-cv-00544-JLK-RSB) Submitted: March 30, 2017 Decided: April 5, 2017 Before TRAXLER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael S. Gorbey, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1029 In Re: MICHAEL S. GORBEY, a/k/a Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (7:16-cv-00455-JLK-RSB; 7:16-cv-00522-JLK-RSB; 7:16-cv-00544-JLK-RSB) Submitted: March 30, 2017 Decided: April 5, 2017 Before TRAXLER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael S. Gorbey, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not b..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1029 In Re: MICHAEL S. GORBEY, a/k/a Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (7:16-cv-00455-JLK-RSB; 7:16-cv-00522-JLK-RSB; 7:16-cv-00544-JLK-RSB) Submitted: March 30, 2017 Decided: April 5, 2017 Before TRAXLER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael S. Gorbey, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Michael S. Gorbey petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motions for reconsideration. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s dockets reveals that the district court entered orders on January 3, 2017, denying the three motions identified in Gorbey’s petition. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Gorbey’s motions, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2
