Filed: Mar. 17, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1100 In re: JOVICA PETROVIC, Petitoner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (5:16-ct-03097-BO) Submitted: March 14, 2017 Decided: March 17, 2017 Before FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jovica Petrovic, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Jovica Petrovic petitions for a writ of mandam
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1100 In re: JOVICA PETROVIC, Petitoner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (5:16-ct-03097-BO) Submitted: March 14, 2017 Decided: March 17, 2017 Before FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jovica Petrovic, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Jovica Petrovic petitions for a writ of mandamu..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-1100
In re: JOVICA PETROVIC,
Petitoner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(5:16-ct-03097-BO)
Submitted: March 14, 2017 Decided: March 17, 2017
Before FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jovica Petrovic, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jovica Petrovic petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging
that the district court has unduly delayed acting on his
complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents
of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,
403 U.S. 388 (1971). He seeks an
order from this court directing the district court to act. We
find the present record does not reveal undue delay in the
district court. Accordingly, we grant Petrovic leave to proceed
in forma pauperis and deny the petition. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2