Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Yvonne Pinkard v. S.L. Nusbaum, 17-1182 (2017)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 17-1182 Visitors: 49
Filed: Jul. 19, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1182 YVONNE PINKARD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. S.L. NUSBAUM; SYKES, BOURDON, AHERN & LEVY P.C.; NORFOLK REDEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING AUTHORITY, NRHA, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:16-cv-00625-RAJ-LRL) Submitted: June 28, 2017 Decided: July 19, 2017 Before SHEDD and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1182 YVONNE PINKARD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. S.L. NUSBAUM; SYKES, BOURDON, AHERN & LEVY P.C.; NORFOLK REDEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING AUTHORITY, NRHA, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:16-cv-00625-RAJ-LRL) Submitted: June 28, 2017 Decided: July 19, 2017 Before SHEDD and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Yvonne Pinkard, Appellant Pro Se. James Thomas Cromwell, SYKES, BOURDON, AHERN & LEVY, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia; David Caldwell Hartnett, CRENSHAW WARE & MARTIN, PLC, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Yvonne Pinkard appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendants’ motions to dismiss and dismissing her complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Pinkard v. S.L. Nusbaum, No. 2:16-cv-00625-RAJ-LRL (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 20, 2017 & entered Jan. 23, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer