Filed: Apr. 20, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1207 ERIC E. MILLER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:15-cv-00744-HEH) Submitted: April 14, 2017 Decided: April 20, 2017 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eric E. Miller, Appellant Pro Se. Unp
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1207 ERIC E. MILLER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:15-cv-00744-HEH) Submitted: April 14, 2017 Decided: April 20, 2017 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eric E. Miller, Appellant Pro Se. Unpu..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1207 ERIC E. MILLER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:15-cv-00744-HEH) Submitted: April 14, 2017 Decided: April 20, 2017 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eric E. Miller, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Eric E. Miller appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action for failure to comply with a court order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Miller v. Supreme Court of VA, No. 3:15-cv- 00744-HEH (E.D. Va. Jan. 31, 2017). We deny the motion for change of venue and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
