Filed: Sep. 28, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1546 ROBERT HOWARD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. COLLEGE OF THE ALBEMARLE; KANDI DEITMEYER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. James C. Dever III, Chief District Judge. (2:15-cv-00039-D) Submitted: September 26, 2017 Decided: September 28, 2017 Before NIEMEYER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirme
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1546 ROBERT HOWARD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. COLLEGE OF THE ALBEMARLE; KANDI DEITMEYER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. James C. Dever III, Chief District Judge. (2:15-cv-00039-D) Submitted: September 26, 2017 Decided: September 28, 2017 Before NIEMEYER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1546 ROBERT HOWARD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. COLLEGE OF THE ALBEMARLE; KANDI DEITMEYER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. James C. Dever III, Chief District Judge. (2:15-cv-00039-D) Submitted: September 26, 2017 Decided: September 28, 2017 Before NIEMEYER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Howard, Appellant Pro Se. John D. Leidy, HORNTHAL, RILEY, ELLIS & MALAND, LLP, Elizabeth City, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Robert Howard appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to his former employer and denying several discovery motions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Howard v. Coll. of the Albemarle, No. 2:15-cv-00039-D (E.D.N.C Mar. 27, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
