Filed: Oct. 13, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1555 HAROLD BOYD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JAXX, LLC, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., District Judge. (3:17-cv-00135-RJC-DCK) Submitted: September 28, 2017 Decided: October 13, 2017 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Harold Boyd, Ap
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1555 HAROLD BOYD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JAXX, LLC, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., District Judge. (3:17-cv-00135-RJC-DCK) Submitted: September 28, 2017 Decided: October 13, 2017 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Harold Boyd, App..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-1555
HAROLD BOYD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JAXX, LLC,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina,
at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., District Judge. (3:17-cv-00135-RJC-DCK)
Submitted: September 28, 2017 Decided: October 13, 2017
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Harold Boyd, Appellant Pro Se. Keith Michael Weddington, PARKER, POE, ADAMS
& BERNSTEIN, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Harold Boyd appeals the district court’s order dismissing his employment
discrimination action under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012) for failure to state a claim.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Boyd. v. Jaxx, LLC, No. 3:17-cv-00135-RJC-DCK
(W.D.N.C. Mar. 29, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2