Filed: Aug. 25, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1674 BISMARK KWAKU TORKORNOO, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. NINA HELWIG, Esq.; JOHN C. MONAHAN, Esq.; MARY TORKORNOO; JACQUELINE EMANGA NGOLE, Esq., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. (8:15-cv-02652-TDC) Submitted: August 17, 2017 Decided: August 25, 2017 Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1674 BISMARK KWAKU TORKORNOO, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. NINA HELWIG, Esq.; JOHN C. MONAHAN, Esq.; MARY TORKORNOO; JACQUELINE EMANGA NGOLE, Esq., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. (8:15-cv-02652-TDC) Submitted: August 17, 2017 Decided: August 25, 2017 Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior C..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-1674
BISMARK KWAKU TORKORNOO,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
NINA HELWIG, Esq.; JOHN C. MONAHAN, Esq.; MARY TORKORNOO;
JACQUELINE EMANGA NGOLE, Esq.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. (8:15-cv-02652-TDC)
Submitted: August 17, 2017 Decided: August 25, 2017
Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bismark Kwaku Torkornoo, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Bismark Kwaku Torkornoo seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting in
part and denying in part his motion to enforce this Court’s judgment and mandate. This
court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and
certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P.
54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,
337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order
Torkornoo seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or
collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED
2