Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Angela Gail Jennings v. Nancy A. Berryhill, 17-1696 (2017)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 17-1696 Visitors: 34
Filed: Oct. 19, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1696 ANGELA GAIL JENNINGS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, Senior District Judge. (1:15-cv-12658) Submitted: October 17, 2017 Decided: October 19, 2017 Before FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Aff
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1696 ANGELA GAIL JENNINGS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, Senior District Judge. (1:15-cv-12658) Submitted: October 17, 2017 Decided: October 19, 2017 Before FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Angela Gail Jennings, Appellant Pro Se. Jordana Cooper, Nora R. Koch, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Stephen Michael Horn, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Angela Gail Jennings appeals the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing her complaint as untimely filed. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jennings v. Berryhill, No. 1:15-cv-12658 (S.D.W. Va. May 31, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer