Filed: Dec. 21, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-2271 KATHERINE HARRIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION; NORTH CAROLINA TEACHERS AND STATE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM; DR. BARRY SHEPHERD, In his official and individual capacity; KATHRYN AUGER, In her official and individual capacity; GARY AUSTIN, In his official and individual capacity, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court f
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-2271 KATHERINE HARRIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION; NORTH CAROLINA TEACHERS AND STATE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM; DR. BARRY SHEPHERD, In his official and individual capacity; KATHRYN AUGER, In her official and individual capacity; GARY AUSTIN, In his official and individual capacity, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court fo..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-2271
KATHERINE HARRIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC INSTRUCTION; NORTH CAROLINA TEACHERS AND STATE
EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM; DR. BARRY SHEPHERD, In his
official and individual capacity; KATHRYN AUGER, In her official and individual
capacity; GARY AUSTIN, In his official and individual capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina,
at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., District Judge. (3:17-cv-00548-RJC-DSC)
Submitted: December 19, 2017 Decided: December 21, 2017
Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Katherine Harris, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Katherine Harris appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Harris v. North
Carolina, No. 3:17-cv-00548-RJC-DSC (W.D.N.C. Oct. 2, 2017). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2