Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

In re: Sean Mescall, 17-2285 (2017)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 17-2285 Visitors: 7
Filed: Dec. 18, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-2285 In re: SEAN F. MESCALL, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (3:12-cr-00215-RJC-1; 3:17-cv-00202-RJC) Submitted: November 27, 2017 Decided: December 18, 2017 Before MOTZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sean F. Mescall, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Sean Mescall pe
More
                                      UNPUBLISHED

                       UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                           FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT


                                       No. 17-2285


In re: SEAN F. MESCALL,

             Petitioner.



    On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (3:12-cr-00215-RJC-1; 3:17-cv-00202-RJC)


Submitted: November 27, 2017                                Decided: December 18, 2017


Before MOTZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.


Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.


Sean F. Mescall, Petitioner Pro Se.


Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

      Sean Mescall petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has

unduly delayed ordering the United States to respond to his 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 (2012)

motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We conclude

that the present record does not disclose undue delay in the district court. Accordingly,

although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before us and argument would not aid the decisional process.



                                                                     PETITION DENIED




                                            2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer