Filed: Nov. 22, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-6667 WILLIAM LEE ANDERSON, II, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PHILIP H. WITHERSPOON, Defendant - Appellee, and COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, Chief District Judge. (7:15-cv-00236-MFU-JCH) Submitted: November 16, 2017 Decided: November 22, 2017 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by u
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-6667 WILLIAM LEE ANDERSON, II, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PHILIP H. WITHERSPOON, Defendant - Appellee, and COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, Chief District Judge. (7:15-cv-00236-MFU-JCH) Submitted: November 16, 2017 Decided: November 22, 2017 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by un..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-6667
WILLIAM LEE ANDERSON, II,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PHILIP H. WITHERSPOON,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, Chief District Judge. (7:15-cv-00236-MFU-JCH)
Submitted: November 16, 2017 Decided: November 22, 2017
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Lee Anderson, II, Appellant Pro Se. Jeff W. Rosen, PENDER & COWARD, PC,
Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
William Lee Anderson, II, appeals the district court’s order accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Anderson’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983
complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Anderson v. Witherspoon, No. 7:15-cv-
00236-MFU-JCH (W.D. Va. Mar. 30, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3