Filed: Dec. 28, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-7514 KEITH MILLER, Petitioner - Appellant, v. SHERIFF AL CANNON, Respondent - Appellee, and CHIEF BEATTY; SCARLETT WILSON; PRELIMINARY HEARING COURT TRANSCRIPT RECORDS; JUDGE GOSNELL; ATTY PATRICIA KENNEDY, Respondents. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Mary Gordon Baker, Magistrate Judge. (2:17-cv-02752-TMC) Submitted: December 21, 2017 Decided: December 28, 201
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-7514 KEITH MILLER, Petitioner - Appellant, v. SHERIFF AL CANNON, Respondent - Appellee, and CHIEF BEATTY; SCARLETT WILSON; PRELIMINARY HEARING COURT TRANSCRIPT RECORDS; JUDGE GOSNELL; ATTY PATRICIA KENNEDY, Respondents. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Mary Gordon Baker, Magistrate Judge. (2:17-cv-02752-TMC) Submitted: December 21, 2017 Decided: December 28, 2017..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-7514
KEITH MILLER,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
SHERIFF AL CANNON,
Respondent - Appellee,
and
CHIEF BEATTY; SCARLETT WILSON; PRELIMINARY HEARING COURT
TRANSCRIPT RECORDS; JUDGE GOSNELL; ATTY PATRICIA KENNEDY,
Respondents.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Charleston. Mary Gordon Baker, Magistrate Judge. (2:17-cv-02752-TMC)
Submitted: December 21, 2017 Decided: December 28, 2017
Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Keith Miller, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Keith Miller seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss his
28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition without prejudice. This court may exercise jurisdiction
only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral
orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan
Corp.,
337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Miller seeks to appeal is neither a final
order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the
appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
3