CARRINGTON v. IMB HoldCO LLC, 16-2190. (2017)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20170706101
Visitors: 14
Filed: Jul. 06, 2017
Latest Update: Jul. 06, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM : John C. Carrington and Deborah T. Carrington appeal the district court's order denying their Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend its order denying their Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for relief from its order dismissing their civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Carrington v. Mnuchin,
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM : John C. Carrington and Deborah T. Carrington appeal the district court's order denying their Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend its order denying their Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for relief from its order dismissing their civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Carrington v. Mnuchin, ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
John C. Carrington and Deborah T. Carrington appeal the district court's order denying their Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend its order denying their Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for relief from its order dismissing their civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Carrington v. Mnuchin, No. 5:13-cv-03422-JMC (D.S.C. Sept. 14, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
