U.S. v. BERNARD, 17-6225. (2017)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20170721083
Visitors: 17
Filed: Jul. 21, 2017
Latest Update: Jul. 21, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM : Richard Dwight Bernard appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Bernard, No. 3:03-cr-00420-JRS-3 (E.D. Va. Jan. 30, 2017). We deny Bernard's motion for an enlargement of time to appeal as moot and
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM : Richard Dwight Bernard appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Bernard, No. 3:03-cr-00420-JRS-3 (E.D. Va. Jan. 30, 2017). We deny Bernard's motion for an enlargement of time to appeal as moot and ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Richard Dwight Bernard appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Bernard, No. 3:03-cr-00420-JRS-3 (E.D. Va. Jan. 30, 2017). We deny Bernard's motion for an enlargement of time to appeal as moot and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
