Filed: Jul. 09, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1911 NING SHEN, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. SECRETARY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Defendant – Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:16-cv-00001-GMG) Submitted: May 02, 2018 Decided: July 9, 2018 Before KEENAN, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dallas I
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1911 NING SHEN, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. SECRETARY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Defendant – Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:16-cv-00001-GMG) Submitted: May 02, 2018 Decided: July 9, 2018 Before KEENAN, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dallas Ia..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-1911
NING SHEN,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
SECRETARY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia,
at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:16-cv-00001-GMG)
Submitted: May 02, 2018 Decided: July 9, 2018
Before KEENAN, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dallas Ian Hammer, ZUCKERMAN LAW, Tysons Corner, Virginia, for Appellant.
William J. Powell, United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, Erin K.
Reisenweber, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
ATTORNEY, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Dr. Ning Shen appeals the district court’s order dismissing her action against the
Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Martinsburg, West Virginia. We have reviewed the
record, as well as the parties’ briefing in this matter, and find no reversible error. See
Hux v. City of Newport News,
451 F.3d 311, 315 (4th Cir. 2006) (a plaintiff’s failure to
demonstrate a genuine issue of material fact regarding pretext warrants summary
judgment). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2