Filed: Feb. 01, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-2106 JAMAAL GITTENS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. NC DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., District Judge. (3:17-cv-00522-RJC-DSC) Submitted: January 30, 2018 Decided: February 1, 2018 Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam o
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-2106 JAMAAL GITTENS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. NC DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., District Judge. (3:17-cv-00522-RJC-DSC) Submitted: January 30, 2018 Decided: February 1, 2018 Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam op..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-2106
JAMAAL GITTENS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
NC DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina,
at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., District Judge. (3:17-cv-00522-RJC-DSC)
Submitted: January 30, 2018 Decided: February 1, 2018
Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jamaal Gittens, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jamaal Gittens appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint in
which he asserted claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) and the Fair Debt Collection
Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692-1692p (2012). We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Gittens v. NC Dep’t of Revenue, No. 3:17-cv-00522-RJC-DSC (W.D.N.C. Sept. 8, 2017).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2