Filed: Apr. 27, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-2304 JACQUELINE LENORLIA TAYLOR, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CVS, INC./CAREMARK, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, District Judge. (3:16-cv-00171-MHL) Submitted: April 17, 2018 Decided: April 27, 2018 Before TRAXLER, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jacqueline L. Taylor
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-2304 JACQUELINE LENORLIA TAYLOR, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CVS, INC./CAREMARK, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, District Judge. (3:16-cv-00171-MHL) Submitted: April 17, 2018 Decided: April 27, 2018 Before TRAXLER, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jacqueline L. Taylor,..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-2304
JACQUELINE LENORLIA TAYLOR,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CVS, INC./CAREMARK,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, District Judge. (3:16-cv-00171-MHL)
Submitted: April 17, 2018 Decided: April 27, 2018
Before TRAXLER, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jacqueline L. Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Gordon Matheson, THOMPSON
MCMULLAN PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jacqueline Lenorlia Taylor seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting
Appellee’s motion to dismiss and dismissing her civil complaint without prejudice. This
court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and
certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P.
54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,
337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order
that Taylor seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or
collateral order. See Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc’y,
807 F.3d 619, 629-30 (4th Cir.
2015). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction and remand the case to
the district court for further proceedings. ∗ We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED AND REMANDED
∗
We note that Taylor claims she did not receive Appellee’s motion to dismiss.
2