Filed: Apr. 02, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-2390 In re: TRAVIS WILKINS, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Submitted: March 29, 2018 Decided: April 2, 2018 Before AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Travis Wilkins, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Travis Wilkins, a North Carolina state prisoner, has filed
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-2390 In re: TRAVIS WILKINS, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Submitted: March 29, 2018 Decided: April 2, 2018 Before AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Travis Wilkins, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Travis Wilkins, a North Carolina state prisoner, has filed i..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-2390
In re: TRAVIS WILKINS,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus.
Submitted: March 29, 2018 Decided: April 2, 2018
Before AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Travis Wilkins, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Travis Wilkins, a North Carolina state prisoner, has filed in this court a petition for
an original writ of habeas corpus. Wilkins alleges that he is being held in pretrial custody
in violation of the United States Constitution, and seeks immediate release and dismissal
of the charges against him. This court ordinarily declines to entertain original habeas
corpus petitions under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012), and this case provides no reason to
depart from this practice. Moreover, we find that the interest of justice would not be
served by transferring the case to the district court, see 28 U.S.C. §§ 1631, 2241(b)
(2012), as Wilkins has filed a similar petition in the district court. See Wilkins v.
Harrison, No. 05:18-hc-02005-FL (E.D.N.C.). Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in
forma pauperis and dismiss Wilkins’ petition. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DISMISSED
2