Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Jeanetta Carter v. Wawa, Inc., 17-2450 (2018)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 17-2450 Visitors: 37
Filed: Jun. 06, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-2450 JEANETTA CARTER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WAWA, INC., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (4:17-cv-00011-AWA-LRL) Submitted: May 31, 2018 Decided: June 6, 2018 Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jeanetta Carter, Appellant Pro Se. M
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-2450 JEANETTA CARTER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WAWA, INC., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (4:17-cv-00011-AWA-LRL) Submitted: May 31, 2018 Decided: June 6, 2018 Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jeanetta Carter, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Gordon Matheson, THOMPSON MCMULLAN PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Jeanetta Carter appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Wawa, Inc. and denying Carter’s amended cross-motion for summary judgment and motion to amend her amended cross motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Carter v. Wawa, Inc., No. 4:17-cv-00011-AWA-LRL (E.D. Va. Dec. 12, 2017). We further grant Carter leave to proceed in forma pauperis, grant Carter’s motion to extend time to file a motion to supplement the record on appeal, and deny Carter’s motions to supplement the record on appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer