Filed: Jan. 22, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-4297 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DONTAE PINKNEY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Terry L. Wooten, Chief District Judge. (3:16-cr-00254-TLW-2) Submitted: December 28, 2017 Decided: January 22, 2018 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John E. Duncan, Lexington, So
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-4297 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DONTAE PINKNEY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Terry L. Wooten, Chief District Judge. (3:16-cr-00254-TLW-2) Submitted: December 28, 2017 Decided: January 22, 2018 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John E. Duncan, Lexington, Sou..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-4297
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DONTAE PINKNEY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Columbia. Terry L. Wooten, Chief District Judge. (3:16-cr-00254-TLW-2)
Submitted: December 28, 2017 Decided: January 22, 2018
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John E. Duncan, Lexington, South Carolina, for Appellant. Beth Drake, United States
Attorney, Jimmie Ewing, Jane Barrett Taylor, Assistant United States Attorneys,
Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Dontae Pinkney seeks to appeal the 125-month sentence imposed following his
guilty plea to Hobbs Act robbery, 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (2012). On appeal, he argues that the
district court abused its discretion in upwardly departing, which resulted in an
unreasonable sentence. The Government seeks to dismiss the appeal as barred by
Pinkney’s waiver of the right to appeal included in the plea agreement. Upon review of
the plea agreement and the transcript of the Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 hearing, we conclude that
Pinkney knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal and that the issue Pinkney
seeks to raise on appeal falls squarely within the compass of his waiver of appellate
rights. See United States v. Archie,
771 F.3d 217, 221 (4th Cir. 2014). We therefore
dismiss the appeal.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
2