Filed: Feb. 02, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-7206 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JASMINE HARGROVE, a/k/a Jasmine Champion, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, Chief District Judge. (5:13-cr-00175-D-1) Submitted: January 30, 2018 Decided: February 2, 2018 Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by u
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-7206 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JASMINE HARGROVE, a/k/a Jasmine Champion, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, Chief District Judge. (5:13-cr-00175-D-1) Submitted: January 30, 2018 Decided: February 2, 2018 Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by un..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-7206
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JASMINE HARGROVE, a/k/a Jasmine Champion,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. James C. Dever III, Chief District Judge. (5:13-cr-00175-D-1)
Submitted: January 30, 2018 Decided: February 2, 2018
Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jasmine Hargrove, Appellant Pro Se. Edward D. Gray, Rudy E. Renfer, Seth Morgan
Wood, Assistant United States Attorneys, Tobin Webb Lathan, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jasmine Hargrove appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. See United States v. Muldrow,
844 F.3d 434, 437 (4th Cir. 2016)
(reviewing district court’s decision whether to reduce sentence under § 3582(c)(2) for
abuse of discretion). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2