Filed: Oct. 16, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-7392 PERCY J. TUCKER, a/k/a Percy James Tucker, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General; CHARLES SAMUELS, Director, Bureau of Prisons; HARRY ATKINSON, Complex Warden; JUSTIN ANDREWS, Warden, FCI-2; MR. JOHNSON, Assistant Warden; LIZ LINDSLEY, Unit Manager, Defendants - Appellees. No. 17-7393 PERCY J. TUCKER, a/k/a Percy James Tucker, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-7392 PERCY J. TUCKER, a/k/a Percy James Tucker, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General; CHARLES SAMUELS, Director, Bureau of Prisons; HARRY ATKINSON, Complex Warden; JUSTIN ANDREWS, Warden, FCI-2; MR. JOHNSON, Assistant Warden; LIZ LINDSLEY, Unit Manager, Defendants - Appellees. No. 17-7393 PERCY J. TUCKER, a/k/a Percy James Tucker, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-7392
PERCY J. TUCKER, a/k/a Percy James Tucker,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General; CHARLES SAMUELS,
Director, Bureau of Prisons; HARRY ATKINSON, Complex Warden; JUSTIN
ANDREWS, Warden, FCI-2; MR. JOHNSON, Assistant Warden; LIZ
LINDSLEY, Unit Manager,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 17-7393
PERCY J. TUCKER, a/k/a Percy James Tucker,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General; CHARLES SAMUELS,
Director, Bureau of Prisons; HARRY ATKINSON, Complex Warden; JUSTIN
ANDREWS, Warden, FCI-2; MR. JOHNSON, Assistant Warden; LIZ
LINDSLEY, Unit Manager,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina,
at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, Chief District Judge. (5:15-ct-03307-D)
Submitted: October 2, 2018 Decided: October 16, 2018
Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Percy James Tucker, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Percy J. Tucker appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation
of the magistrate judge, dismissing his civil complaint, and denying reconsideration. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. See Tucker v. Lynch, No. 5:15-ct-03307-D (E.D.N.C.
Feb. 22, 2018; Oct. 4, 2017; Mar. 28, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3