Filed: Feb. 02, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-7401 RAYMOND THOMAS, Petitioner - Appellant, v. WARDEN OF FCI-EDGEFIELD, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (1:16-cv-03928-RMG) Submitted: January 30, 2018 Decided: February 2, 2018 Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Raymond T
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-7401 RAYMOND THOMAS, Petitioner - Appellant, v. WARDEN OF FCI-EDGEFIELD, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (1:16-cv-03928-RMG) Submitted: January 30, 2018 Decided: February 2, 2018 Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Raymond Th..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-7401
RAYMOND THOMAS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN OF FCI-EDGEFIELD,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken.
Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (1:16-cv-03928-RMG)
Submitted: January 30, 2018 Decided: February 2, 2018
Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Raymond Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, Assistant United States
Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Raymond Thomas, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting
the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Thomas’ 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(2012) petition. Thomas’ objections were sufficient to preserve appellate review, but we
nonetheless affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. Thomas v. Warden, No.
1:16-cv-03928-RMG (D.S.C. Sept. 20, 2017). We grant leave to proceed in forma
pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2