Filed: Jul. 05, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-7595 BRANDON ROBERTS, Plaintiff - Appellant, and RANDY GOLDEN; AUGUSTUS WOODARD; JOHN ARTIS, Plaintiffs, v. BOBBY P. SHEARIN, Warden, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (8:13-cv-01528-RDB) Submitted: June 20, 2018 Decided: July 5, 2018 Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-7595 BRANDON ROBERTS, Plaintiff - Appellant, and RANDY GOLDEN; AUGUSTUS WOODARD; JOHN ARTIS, Plaintiffs, v. BOBBY P. SHEARIN, Warden, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (8:13-cv-01528-RDB) Submitted: June 20, 2018 Decided: July 5, 2018 Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per ..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-7595 BRANDON ROBERTS, Plaintiff - Appellant, and RANDY GOLDEN; AUGUSTUS WOODARD; JOHN ARTIS, Plaintiffs, v. BOBBY P. SHEARIN, Warden, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (8:13-cv-01528-RDB) Submitted: June 20, 2018 Decided: July 5, 2018 Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Brandon Roberts, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Brandon Roberts appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Roberts v. Shearin, No. 8:13-cv-01528-RDB (D. Md. Nov. 21, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
