Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Eugene Smalls, 17-7640 (2018)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 17-7640 Visitors: 14
Filed: Apr. 23, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-7640 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. EUGENE SMALLS, a/k/a Gene Smalls, a/k/a Kishawnie Henry, a/k/a Quickness, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief District Judge. (2:96-cr-00131-RBS-1) Submitted: April 19, 2018 Decided: April 23, 2018 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and THACKER and HARRIS, Circuit Jud
More
                                    UNPUBLISHED

                       UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                           FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT


                                      No. 17-7640


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                    Plaintiff - Appellee,

             v.

EUGENE SMALLS, a/k/a Gene Smalls, a/k/a Kishawnie Henry, a/k/a Quickness,

                    Defendant - Appellant.



Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief District Judge. (2:96-cr-00131-RBS-1)


Submitted: April 19, 2018                                         Decided: April 23, 2018


Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and THACKER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.


Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


Eugene Smalls, Appellant Pro Se.


Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

      Eugene Smalls appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. United States v. Smalls, No. 2:96-cr-00131-RBS-1 (E.D. Va. Nov. 30, 2017). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

                                                                           AFFIRMED




                                          2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer