Filed: Apr. 10, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1006 STARSHA M. SEWELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL, INCORPORATED, (Claims Department), Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. James K. Bredar, Chief District Judge. (8:16-cv-00906-DKC) Submitted: April 6, 2018 Decided: April 10, 2018 Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1006 STARSHA M. SEWELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL, INCORPORATED, (Claims Department), Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. James K. Bredar, Chief District Judge. (8:16-cv-00906-DKC) Submitted: April 6, 2018 Decided: April 10, 2018 Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. S..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1006 STARSHA M. SEWELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL, INCORPORATED, (Claims Department), Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. James K. Bredar, Chief District Judge. (8:16-cv-00906-DKC) Submitted: April 6, 2018 Decided: April 10, 2018 Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Starsha Sewell, Appellant Pro Se. Michael William Tompkins, FIDELITY NATIONAL LAW GROUP, Vienna, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Starsha Sewell appeals the district court’s order construing her motion for leave to reopen this civil action as a motion for leave to file and denying the motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sewell v. Fidelity Nat’l Fin., Inc., No. 8:16-cv-00906-DKC (D. Md. Dec. 14, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
