Filed: Apr. 24, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1048 TIMOTHY E. TWEED, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. RAPPAHANNOCK REGIONAL JAIL; RAPPAHANNOCK REGIONAL JAIL AUTHORITY; JOSEPH HIGGS, JR., Official and Individual Capacity; PHIL GRIMES, Official and Individual Capacity; HUSTON NORRIS, Official and Individual Capacity; KALEN DONALDSON, Official and Individual Capacity, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Al
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1048 TIMOTHY E. TWEED, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. RAPPAHANNOCK REGIONAL JAIL; RAPPAHANNOCK REGIONAL JAIL AUTHORITY; JOSEPH HIGGS, JR., Official and Individual Capacity; PHIL GRIMES, Official and Individual Capacity; HUSTON NORRIS, Official and Individual Capacity; KALEN DONALDSON, Official and Individual Capacity, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Ale..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-1048
TIMOTHY E. TWEED,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
RAPPAHANNOCK REGIONAL JAIL; RAPPAHANNOCK REGIONAL JAIL
AUTHORITY; JOSEPH HIGGS, JR., Official and Individual Capacity; PHIL
GRIMES, Official and Individual Capacity; HUSTON NORRIS, Official and
Individual Capacity; KALEN DONALDSON, Official and Individual Capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:16-cv-01164-LO-MSN)
Submitted: April 19, 2018 Decided: April 24, 2018
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and THACKER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Timothy Everette Tweed, Appellant Pro Se. Alexander Francuzenko, COOK CRAIG &
FRANCUZENKO, PLLC, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Timothy Everette Tweed appeals the district court’s orders: (1) granting summary
judgment to Defendants in this action alleging discharge in violation of the Age
Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 to 634 (West 2008 &
Supp. 2017); and denying Tweed’s motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Tweed v. Rappahannock Reg’l Jail, No. 1:16-cv-01164-LO-MSN (E.D.
Va. Dec. 14, 2017 & Jan. 2, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2